GF said: We need standards on how to describe the health data and their epistemology/context, modeling patterns and rules on how to use coding systems and deal with ‘negation’, just to mention a few other things needed to define data inside EHR systems in such a way that data can exchanged.
Dear Gerard, you know the joke? A: We have 14 standards how to be interoperable in healthcare IT B: What? I go and create a new standard which replaces all these standards. A: We have 15 standards how to be interoperable in healthcare IT The lesson is: We are all to small to be the center of the universe. We can all be a part of it, nothing more. Op do 28 jun. 2018 23:45 schreef GF <gf...@luna.nl>: > > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 > gf...@luna.nl > > Kattensingel 20 > 2801 CA Gouda > the Netherlands > > On 28 Jun 2018, at 16:03, Stefan Sauermann <sauerm...@technikum-wien.at> > wrote: > > Instead, the greatest hope for *effective systems will be realized when > the infrastructure for introducing computational tools in medicine has been > put in place by visionary leaders who understand the importance of > networking, integration, shared access to patient data bases, and the use > of standards for data exchange, communications, and knowledge sharing.*” > > > We need standards on how to describe the health data and their > epistemology/context, modeling patterns and rules on how to use coding > systems and deal with ‘negation’, just to mention a few other things needed > to define data inside EHR systems in such a way that data can exchanged. > > > The archetype community (and many other standards groups) have them all, > volunteers, early adopters, and large scale implementers. Sometimes we lose > sight of each other, but they are all there. > > Looking forward, > greetings from Vienna, > > Stefan > > >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
