Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Thomas Beale wrote: > > >>> Not sure of the need for <= or >=. It's either beyond the value reading >>> capability of the device or an actual value is record (within some accuracy >>> tolerance). >>> >> yes, this has already been mentioned - Vince has never seen it in the >> millions of results his software has processed. Vince suggested we put >> it in for completeness, but now that you hvae made me think of >> it...maybe we should only allow what makes sense, i.e. =, >, <.....with >> ~ still to be resolved... >> > > <= >= do happen over here in Germany. > can you provide an example of a path result with either of those in it?
- thomas
