> EN13606 EHRcom is the result of an European/Australian consensus process and > can not be equated with OpenEHR. > EN13606 can be used to map to legacy systems and interact with OpenEHR > conformant systems.
So 13606 EHRcom is very much a go-between format - something that can be used to transfer clinical data between systems, but not something around which you would build an actual running system i.e. a system sitting in a GP's office? Is that the correct thinking? > Your technical comments I will refer to Dipak Kalra the task force leader. > > ADL and part 2 of the EN13606 are identical. How does the openehr governance and CEN process mesh? At the moment, if we find a typo in the ADL spec, we mail Thomas and he fixes it (I know there is an actual formal openEHR process but for simple changes, that is what is boils down to :). When it becomes an ISO standard, do changes to the openEHR ADL spec automatically transfer across into the ISO standard? Is there any chance in a divergence between the languages? Andrew _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
