Our course mapping between two solutions is just postponing the issues.

Maybe some day we will get to a single solution.

Ed Hammond


|---------+------------------------------------->
|         |           Thomas Beale              |
|         |           <Thomas.Beale at OceanInforma|
|         |           tics.biz>                 |
|         |           Sent by:                  |
|         |           openehr-technical-bounces@|
|         |           openehr.org               |
|         |                                     |
|         |                                     |
|         |           10/16/2006 06:12 AM       |
|         |           Please respond to For     |
|         |           openEHR technical         |
|         |           discussions               |
|         |                                     |
|---------+------------------------------------->
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                                     |
  |       To:       For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical at 
openehr.org>                                                                |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                                                     |
  |       Subject:  Re: AW: HL7 templates/archetypes                            
                                                                     |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Gerard Freriks wrote:
>
>> Dear Dana,
>>
>> Why would you like to do that?
>> Theoretically it might be possible to map computationally constraints
>> imposed on one model to others imposed on an other, where both ways
>> express the same clinical model.
>> But I doubt that this can be done.
>> So far only humans can make the translation since only us humans have
>> an "internal ontology", an internal knowledge of the clinical world,
>> that makes this possible.
>> As far as I can see it, the CEN/tc251 EN13606 part 1 is a model of
>> any document.
>> The HL7v3 RIM is a linguistic model of any possible statement of fact.
>> Both are not the same.
>
> Doesn't CDA provide the model for a document in the context of HL7?
>
it does. The only problem is that where HL7v3 is being used, the
relevant authority may well ordain the use of specific messages rather
than templated CDA, creating a much larger mapping problem.

- thomas beale


_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical



_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical



Reply via email to