Hi Ime,

There is some information on the developer's wiki
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/dev/Developers+Home

I personally believe (though I haven't yet proved it).  That it is much
more efficient to use an object database.  Realized by code reduction
(30%?) and ease and speed of queries.

A project for another day is for me to write this up and post it on the
wiki as well.

Cheers,
Tim



-  
Timothy Cook, MSc
Health Informatics Research & Development Services
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook 
Skype ID == timothy.cook 
**************************************************************
*You may get my Public GPG key from  popular keyservers or   *
*from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home*
**************************************************************


On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 01:10 -0800, Ime Asangansi wrote:
> HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
> 
> My question is on persistence layer for openehr java.
> I was wondering if any body could give me a link to such.
> 
> Also, is it possibe to generate a hibernate mapping for the openehr
> java classes for use for a db schema. In other words, does the openehr
> classes include a data model layer.
> 
> (Apologies if its a stupid question but please someone kindly
> elucidate)
> 
> Cheers,
> Ime
> 
> openehr-technical-request at openehr.org wrote:
>         Send openEHR-technical mailing list submissions to
>         openehr-technical at openehr.org
>         
>         To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>         or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         openehr-technical-request at openehr.org
>         
>         You can reach the person managing the list at
>         openehr-technical-owner at openehr.org
>         
>         When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>         specific
>         than "Re: Contents of openEHR-technical digest..."
>         
>         
>         Today's Topics:
>         
>         1. Re: path of ArchetypeInternalRef (Bert Verhees)
>         
>         
>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>         
>         Message: 1
>         Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:17:03 +0100
>         From: Bert Verhees 
>         Subject: Re: path of ArchetypeInternalRef
>         To: For openEHR technical discussions 
>         Message-ID: <476B767F.2090605 at rosa.nl>
>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>         
>         Sam Heard schreef:
>         > Heath has said it how it is:
>         >
>         > Archetype paths - that is the path to each node in an
>         archetype - is
>         > unique. This is what the ADL statement you have seen refers
>         to.
>         >
>         > In data, in contrast, an individual archetype node which has
>         > occurrences set as (1...2) in the archetype could exist
>         twice in the
>         > data. That is what occurrences of 2 means. How then to
>         differentiate
>         > between the two instances of this node. The answer is in the
>         name of
>         > that thing - which can be coded or free text. What this
>         means is that
>         > you can ask for something in the data as a specific instance
>         (unique)
>         > which may have a name in the path as well as the
>         archetype_node_id's -
>         > for example:
>         >
>         > /items[at0002 and name/value="xxx"]
>         >
>         > or as a path as in the archetype
>         >
>         > /items[at0002]
>         >
>         > which will return all instances of the node.
>         >
>         > Both paths transform to XPath in a very straightforward
>         manner and
>         > give the same results.
>         >
>         > Hope this is helpful.
>         Thanks Sam, for explaining, so, if I may resume:
>         
>         If you have a node in your ADL
>         /items[0002]
>         
>         and you have a node
>         /items[0003]
>         
>         and /items[0003] contains a Internalref to items/[0002], what
>         will be
>         the ADL-path?
>         
>         My guess is, in cADL it will be /items[0003] (because, that is
>         the
>         location of the internalref)
>         In data it will be /items[0002] with a "name"-qualifier.
>         
>         Is that correct?
>         
>         Thanks, Bert
>         
>         
>         ------------------------------
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         openEHR-technical mailing list
>         openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>         http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>         
>         
>         End of openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 17, Issue 27
>         *************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> Why will you acquire so much informatics knowledge and not share...
> Contribute to http://www.wiki.ehealthpedia.org/
> 
> "A little more persistence, a little more effort, and what seemed
> hopeless failure may turn to glorious success" - Elbert Hubbard
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
> Search.
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071231/0737cccd/attachment.asc>

Reply via email to