Think about it as an opportunity. Sports Medicine is a very data rich 
environment.

This provides a very good testing ground for archetypes. 

Gordon Tomes
Acute Care Division
Department of Health and Ageing (MDP 63)
PO Box 9848, Canberra ACT 2601 
Ph 02 6289 5081 |  Mobile 0423 024 922 | Fax 02 6289 7630




"Heather Leslie" <heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.biz> 
Sent by: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
02/07/2007 08:04 PM
Please respond to
For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical at openehr.org>


To
"'For openEHR technical discussions'" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
cc

Subject
RE: modeling non-medical data  [No Protective Marking]








I think it is wrong to be too 'pure' about what constitutes health
information.  In this situation a heart rate archetype can be specialized
for this very specific purpose, and the cadence etc is important part of 
the
context of the observation, being part of a very detailed record relating 
to
exertion, and should be recorded in their health record as state data.  I
don't see any particular problem with GPS being recorded here as well if 
it
fulfils a specific need. 

This particular specialization may not end up having international status 
if
not broadly used, but consider that it may be used in all personal health
records used by elite cyclists. 

The ideal is to make archetypes as broadly used as possible to facilitate
interoperability, but if they need to be develope for a specific or 
one-off
purpose, or for use within just one healthcare facility, then that is 
still
a valid use of archetypes albeit at the cost of some 'shareability'.

Heather

_______________________________________________
Dr Heather Leslie
Director, Senior Clinical Consultant
Ocean Informatics Pty Ltd
M  +61 418 966 670 (in Australia)
M  +44 7722 064 546 (in UK)
Skype - heather.leslie.oi
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
>bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Patterson
>Sent: Monday, 2 July 2007 7:31 PM
>To: For openEHR technical discussions
>Subject: Re: modeling non-medical data
>
>> But the purpose then would not be to collect data for healthcare
>> purposes - i.e. this post is about the use of open EHR standards and
>> technologies for to answer a scientific question?
>
>Well, this is dilemna I guess - it's data about a person, created
>from a physical activity - but it's not a clinical observation. It
>is being used for healthcare purposes, albeit with very
>specialised goals - the data is used to set safe training exertion
>ranges etc for the atheletes.
>
>I may end up doing it with an ad-hoc system - I just thought it
>would be interesting to consider how it might be done using
>openehr.
>
>Andrew
>_______________________________________________
>openEHR-technical mailing list
>openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>__________ NOD32 2368 (20070701) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.eset.com

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical

______________________________________________________________________
"Important: This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and 
may contain confidential or legally privileged information.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this transmission in 
error please notify the author immediately and delete all copies of this 
transmission."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070703/1b88b881/attachment.html>

Reply via email to