Hi Bert, Yes, I believe it should be changed. I actually made a heading change for the subject setting in the GUI of the archetype editor when I saw that the subject attribute of the ENTRY classes should be a PARTY_RELATED (which represents the relation to the subject of data) and not a PARTY_SELF (which represents the subject of data).
For some reason I never realized that the terminology.xml was wrong. Regards, Mattias 2007/3/16, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl>: > > This line is in it: > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="32" Rubric="Subject of data" /> > > when you go to grouper: > <Grouper id="1" ConceptID="32" /> > > and then to groupedconcept: > <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="0" /> > <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="3" /> > <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="6" /> > <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="7" /> > > etc.... > > which points to: > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="0" Rubric="self" /> > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="3" Rubric="foetus" /> > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="6" Rubric="donor" /> > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="7" Rubric="maternal grandmother" /> > etc... > -------------------------------- > I wonder if the above (first) line should be > <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="32" Rubric="Related party > relationship" /> > > because this is also in the PDF-documents: terminology.pdf page 22 > and in support_im.pdf, page: 59 > > Thanks, > bert > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070316/85cd43b2/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
