And that is fine of course, I am just wondering if there is an XML conversion that can be considered the 'source of truth'. i.e. will the XML committed to the svn repository always be in the same format e.g. will OceanInformatics always use their converter?
On 11/6/07, Erik Sundvall <erisu at imt.liu.se> wrote: > Hi! > > On 11/5/07, Greg Caulton <caultonpos at gmail.com> wrote: > > To get around this I started to use the LiU Archetype Editor but I > > realize now it generates a different XML than on subversion. For > > example the LiU editor generates nodes with type > > > > <children xsi:type="at:C_QUANTITY"> > > <rm_type_name>DvQuantity</rm_type_name> > > > > but on subversion it has > > > > <children xsi:type="C_DV_QUANTITY"> > > <rm_type_name>QUANTITY</rm_type_name> > > > > Is the XML unreliable such that I must use a Java ADL parser? > > The XML-serialisation code used in the LiU editor is experimental and > has not been revised for several months. If anyone has interest in > updating it don't hesitate to have a go at it. Code patches are > welcome, we are currently focusing more on other related projects but > we don't mind releasing new builds when we get code contributions. > > Best regards, > Erik Sundvall > erisu at imt.liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ Tel: +46-13-227579 > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >
