Hi Thomas, I would disagree that the version of ICD-10 is "10". Even terminology systems like ICD-10 are revised (for example in Sweden once a year) and released in different releases. I therefore think that is fair to handle ICD-9 and ICD-10 as different systems in the same way as SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT are.
Greetings, Mikael From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: den 21 februari 2011 12:36 To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Subject: Re: constraint binding error On 21/02/2011 04:14, pablo pazos wrote: Hi Michael, Not every terminology version is a date. In ICD 10, the version is "10". I think the version to be a valid date is not a problem here. most people consider ICD10 as simply a different terminology from ICD9. There are variants like ICD10AM, ICD9CM and so on... and in theory, there are no 'versions' of these terminologies, at least as far as I know - WHO issues once and that's it (not sure about the AM and CM releases though). - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110221/5668713b/attachment.html>