Hi Thomas, Maybe we could think of CM/AM in ICD, and CT/CT-AU in Snomed like the "country/variant" in a locale, (en_UK or en_UK_v1) leaving the version alone (version = a number or date or id or whatever).
-- Kind regards, A/C Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:36:12 +0000 From: thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Subject: Re: constraint binding error On 21/02/2011 04:14, pablo pazos wrote: Hi Michael, Not every terminology version is a date. In ICD 10, the version is "10". I think the version to be a valid date is not a problem here. most people consider ICD10 as simply a different terminology from ICD9. There are variants like ICD10AM, ICD9CM and so on... and in theory, there are no 'versions' of these terminologies, at least as far as I know - WHO issues once and that's it (not sure about the AM and CM releases though). - thomas _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110221/705a77a5/attachment.html>
