Hi Diego & Peter, What Diego said about evolving tests for ADL1.5 is true, we don't want to test the tools or the specs, we want to test our implementations (EHRs, services, repositories, etc). I agree this overlaps in some way with the CKM content (archetypes and templates), but our focus is on flat archetypes and operative templates, things that will be used by systems, not on source ADL archetypes with slots, abstract types and other things that makes implementation a pain in the 4$$... you know waht I mean. I agree what Diego said in the last message: we want RM instances (XML) in the repo, which will be valid against XSDs (that we need to test and fix, XSDs will be included in the repo too). JSON instances will be welcome too :D
To give more context, this is taken from a private message to Erik: What I have in mind is to create something like a unit test for openEHR applications and services, with archetypes, rm instances and term sets. E.g. having a test set with some archetypes, a template, some term sets and a couple of instances in xml and json formats, and create some small software that can handle those test sets, validating instances to schemas, validating structures to archetypes, etc. and maybe geting data from the instances and doing something with it, .... -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos > From: yampeku at gmail.com > Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 00:23:44 +0200 > Subject: Re: How about creating an openEHR test base? > To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org > > Pablo also mentioned 'RM instances in a variety of formats', which are > not 'artefacts'. > > 2012/5/7 Peter Gummer <peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com>: > > Diego Bosc? wrote: > > > >> I would say the scope of that repository is different, as that is part > >> of the test for current evolving 1.5 syntax and does not include > >> 'real' archetypes > > > > My understanding was that Pablo was not proposing real archetypes either. > > In his original post, Pablo proposed a "test base with sample artifacts". > > > > How would this be different from the purpose of the existing > > http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge2 repository? The only difference that > > I can see is that Pablo has proposed adding a greater variety of artefacts > > (OPTs, etc.), so it seems natural to add them to the existing repository. > > > > - Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120506/51bcdd01/attachment.html>
