On 19/04/2013 16:06, Randolph Neall wrote: > Seref, to add to my questions: > > > AQL is the most neglected, yet, probably one of the most important > components of an openEHR implementation. > > Does this imply that each implementation of openEHR is sufficiently > different from others as not to allow for easy sharing of such things > as search or storage technologies? >
Randy, not sure what you mean by 'sharing' here? Most back-ends are designed as an open platform, obeying (or starting to obey) standardised service interfaces and the AQL language. So being able to replace one implementation with another is the whole idea, and certainly possible with some vendors already. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130420/901bb6d5/attachment.html>
