Hi Alessandro, I think you propose this?
/items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark /items[at0009,2]/value/value = Rutte regards Bert Verhees Alessandro Torrisi schreef op 19-11-2013 20:19: > i would say > > /items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark > /items[at0008,2]/value/value = Rutte > > Alessandro > > > > On 19 November 2013 13:57, Diego Bosc? <yampeku at gmail.com > <mailto:yampeku at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Bert, > > Personally I would use: > > /items[at0008]/value[1]/value = Jan > /items[at0008]/value[2]/value = Peter > /items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende > > Regards > > 2013/11/19 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl > <mailto:bert.verhees at rosa.nl>>: > > Hi all, > > > > I had following interesting discussion. > > > > Suppose we have a cluster containing name of a person. > > > > There is a field called firstname, and a field called lastname. > > > > The problem is concerning the ADL-path, what should be used. > > > > This is a part of the archetype: > > > > CLUSTER[at0007] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- voornamen > > items cardinality matches {0..*; ordered} > matches { > > ELEMENT[at0008] occurrences matches > {0..*} > > matches { -- firstname > > value matches { > > DV_TEXT matches {*} > > } > > } > > ELEMENT[at0009] occurrences matches > {0..1} > > matches { -- lastname > > value matches { > > DV_TEXT matches {*} > > } > > } > > } > > > > > > This is a hypothecical example, only to explain: > > > > Because at0008 has upper-occurrences of more then 1 ( a person > can have more > > then one firstnames) > > And at0009 has upper-occurrences of 1 (people only have one > last-name (in > > this hypothetical country)) > > > > If we want to express data in a path/value combination, what > would be the > > best solution? > > > > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan > > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter > > /items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende > > > > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan > > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter > > /items[at0009][1]/value/value = Balkenende > > > > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan > > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter > > /items[at0009][3]/value/value = Balkenende > > > > Or would another solution be better? > > Thanks in advance for suggestions. > > > > Kind regards > > Bert Verhees > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-technical mailing list > > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > <mailto:openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org> > > > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > <mailto:openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org> > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > > -- > Alessandro Torrisi > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20131119/15339995/attachment.html>
