All of it is very, very generalizable :)

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com> wrote:

> Presumably the outline syntax, SELECT, CONTAINS etc is generalisable?
>
> Ian
>
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> office +44 (0)1536 414994
> skype: ianmcnicoll
> email: i...@freshehr.com
> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
> On 27 August 2015 at 08:22, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> wrote:
>
>> Like the Ocean Archetype editor. It only supports the OpenEhr RM only.
>> That is understandable and no problem. The market will fill in that gap.
>> Op 27 aug. 2015 01:49 schreef "Heath Frankel" <
>> heath.fran...@oceaninformatics.com>:
>>
>> Technical, the original grammar for AQL was bound to openEHR RM classes,
>>> composition, version, observation, etc. theoretically it could be
>>> generalised to be a RM agnostic and should be the goal of the current AQL
>>> specification work if it hasn't already been done in the antlr grammar.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Heath
>>>
>>> On 26 Aug 2015, at 9:40 pm, "Ian McNicoll" <i...@freshehr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Diego,
>>>
>>> I was not aware of any 13606 implementations that support AQL , although
>>> I am sure there is some sort of path-based querying. AFAIK AQL is not part
>>> of the 13606 scope.
>>>
>>> Happy to be corrected.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> Dr Ian McNicoll
>>> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
>>> office +44 (0)1536 414994
>>> skype: ianmcnicoll
>>> email: i...@freshehr.com
>>> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>>>
>>> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
>>> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
>>> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
>>> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>>>
>>> On 26 August 2015 at 13:03, Diego Boscá <yamp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with most of the points, but I'm curious why you say that 13606
>>>> does not support AQL (and in any case wouldn't be "AQL does not support
>>>> 13606"?)
>>>>
>>>> 2015-08-26 12:32 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> This might help a little
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/atalagk/implementation-and-use-of-iso-en-13606-and-openehr
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarities:
>>>>>
>>>>> Both use archetypes and ADL and two-level information modelling.
>>>>> Both share the EHR, FOLDERS,COMPOSITIONS, ENTRY, ELEMENT classes.
>>>>> Some archetype tools can work with both styles of archetype e.g
>>>>> LinkEHR and Archetype Workbench.
>>>>> The just announced ADL2 Archetype editor/ template designer tools
>>>>> (beware!!! Early developer versions!!)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ehrscape.marand.si/designer/template-editor.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ehrscape.marand.si/designer/archetype-editor.html
>>>>>
>>>>> should be relatively easy to adapt to 13606 or other archetype-based
>>>>> reference models such as CIMI. They will be open sourced very soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Differences:
>>>>>
>>>>> The EHR reference models are different
>>>>>  In spite of sharing the classes above, the attributes within those
>>>>> classes differ
>>>>>  openEHR sub-classes ENTRY into ADMIN_ENTRY, OBSERVATION, EVALUATION,
>>>>> INSTRUCTION and ACTION
>>>>>  The datatypes are different
>>>>>
>>>>> The demographic models are different
>>>>> The EHR Extract formats are different
>>>>>
>>>>> 13606 is intended primarily for the communication of EHR extracts
>>>>> across systems but some persistence repositories exist.
>>>>> openEHR is intended primarily for data persistence and querying within
>>>>> systems but it is possible to message openEHR data.
>>>>>
>>>>> 13606 does not (currently) support templates but ADL/AOM2 is being
>>>>> considered
>>>>> 13606 does not support AQL Archetype Query Language
>>>>>
>>>>> 13606 is  formal ISO standard but is closed source i.e. behind a
>>>>> paywall, as in normal for ISO published material
>>>>> openEHR is open source and freely available
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a great deal of cross-communication between the two
>>>>> communities and a number of people work with both formalisms. It is
>>>>> possible to transform data between the two formalisms but they are not
>>>>> directly compatible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that is accurate and non-contentious!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr Ian McNicoll
>>>>> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
>>>>> office +44 (0)1536 414994
>>>>> skype: ianmcnicoll
>>>>> email: i...@freshehr.com
>>>>> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>>>>>
>>>>> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
>>>>> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
>>>>> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
>>>>> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 August 2015 at 10:14, 王海生 <edwin_ue...@163.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> dear all ,
>>>>>>     how could i  explain to someone difference and relationship
>>>>>> between openEHR and EN13606
>>>>>> thx
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 王海生
>>>>>> 15901958021
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 夏日畅销榜大牌美妆只要1元
>>>>>> <http://r.mail.163.com/r.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.163.com%2Fhd%2Foneact%2Fhdframe.do%3Fid%3D21%26from%3Dfooter_beauty&sign=817593681&_r_ignore_statId=7_13_79_48&_r_ignore_uid=n...@163.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>>>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to