I mean the submission of certain openEHR specs to ISO can be made with
the present formal status of the Foundation being tied to UCL. To
further gain acceptance also by governmental bodies around the globe
where people may like openEHR but may hesitate to invest in such an
informal body success, I think that a true international organisation
without any ties to a specific university may be of some (not big but
some) benefit. Also avoid criticisms of the Freriks type.
Best regards
Gunnar
Den 2015-09-04 kl. 09:56, skrev Bert Verhees:
On 04-09-15 09:31, Gunnar Klein wrote:
Irrespective of this, I argued a year ago for the foundation to take
steps towards becoming a true international non profit foundation
breaking its ties witht the UCL as a founder. It is an anomaly in
today's world.
Gunnar,
Can you explain what the advantage is of the foundation breaking its
ties with UCL?
Although, sticked to the end of your message with the word
"Irrespective" It seems a key sentence in your message, and I miss the
explanation.
Thanks
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
