Dear Ian, I wrote I will consider it.
I can accept your proposition. It is factually the truth. Gerard Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl> > On 7 sep. 2015, at 16:02, Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com> wrote: > > Thanks Gerard, > > That is very positive and helpful. Would you consider adjusting to ‘ openEHR > is a not-for-profit company established by UCL’ which I hope captures your > reservations about single ownership without giving the impression that this > is a 'for-profit 'company? > > Ian > > Dr Ian McNicoll > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > office +44 (0)1536 414994 > skype: ianmcnicoll > email: i...@freshehr.com <mailto:i...@freshehr.com> > twitter: @ianmcnicoll > > > Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org > <mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org> > Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. > Director, HANDIHealth CIC > Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > > On 7 September 2015 at 14:38, "Gerard Freriks (privé)" <gf...@luna.nl > <mailto:gf...@luna.nl>> wrote: > Dear Ian, > > As I wrote you privately I promised to think over my use of words. > > Referring to my e-mail with the definition, as I used it, plus the quote from > the openEHR website, > it must have been clear that I was pointing at ownership of the openEHR > organisation. > > I’m aware now, that ‘proprietary’ has an other, different, meaning, when > applied to software or specifications. > My original e-mail conveyed an unintended meaning, is my conclusion. > Therefore I will no longer use the word ‘proprietary’ but the phrase ‘ > openEHR as a company owned by UCL’. > > With regards, > > Gerard > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 <tel:%2B31%20620347088> > gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl> >> On 3 sep. 2015, at 02:07, Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com >> <mailto:i...@freshehr.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Bert, >> >> I am certainly conscious of rumours. Some of these are due to general >> suspicion of open source licensing (and we can, I think, do more to >> alleviate this) but I am afraid some of anxiety is also caused by >> inaccurate and misleading information "openEHR is proprietary", regularly >> stated by a small number of individuals. I have had to ask for these to be >> corrected in a number of documents e.g. The SemanticHealthNet report where >> it was agreed by the principal authors, including Dipak, to be incorrect. >> >> Since a significant number of companies and national organisations now make >> use of openEHR specifications or artefacts, these statements are being >> regarded as commercially hostile and the Foundation Boards both agree that >> legal action should now be taken where the authors are not prepared to >> promptly correct this inaccuracy. >> >> Leaving that aside. I am not convinced that ISO is a good home for openEHR. >> The specifications, development and revision process in ISO remain >> completely closed and quite at odds withopenEHR principles but I would be >> interested in other's views. >> >> I do think that some sort of association with a formal standards body would >> help alleviate some of the anxieties you mention (though these are >> imaginary) but I am not sure that ISO would be my first choice as it is >> currently constructed. I will raise the issue of whether to submit AOM2 with >> the Management Board. >> >> I am interested in other people's opinions. >> >> Ian >> >> >> Dr Ian McNicoll >> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29775%20209%207859> >> office +44 (0)1536 414994 <tel:%2B44%20%280%291536%20414994> >> skype: ianmcnicoll >> email: i...@freshehr.com <mailto:i...@freshehr.com> >> twitter: @ianmcnicoll >> >> >> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org >> <mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org> >> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. >> Director, HANDIHealth CIC >> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL >> >> On 1 September 2015 at 16:48, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl >> <mailto:bert.verh...@rosa.nl>> wrote: >> On 01-09-15 17:16, Bert Verhees wrote: >> I have written a text (reply to Erik) in Stackoverflow, describing why it >> will be good for OpenEHR if AOM2.0 will become an ISO-standard in the >> context of ISO13606 renewal. >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32010122/are-the-hl7-fhir-hl7-cda-cimi-openehr-and-iso13606-approaches-aiming-to-solve/ >> >> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32010122/are-the-hl7-fhir-hl7-cda-cimi-openehr-and-iso13606-approaches-aiming-to-solve/> >> >> >> I must add, it is not that I suspect anyone of having secret IP on OpenEHR. >> I have no reason to suspect this. >> >> But I know people who have such suspicions, and having the AOM-part as an >> ISO standard, surely will fight these rumors. >> >> I think it will help OpenEHR-implementations to have more customers. >> >> Bert >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >> >> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
