On 08/09/2015 21:55, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
ND on the specification documents is not a big or urgent problem if
there are Apace 2 licenced computable artifacts
like UML-files/descriptions of all classes, ADL/AQL grammars, openEHR
term lists/vocabularies and other things needed for building actual
systems. I believe that is already the case (or at least the intention).
we probably need to perform an audit on all of these artefacts to check
the licences. One thing we need to change is to allow more types of
software licence, e.g. AGPL. Large companies and huge health
institutions like the NHS simply cannot expect to be able to use
everything for free when it costs quite serious investment on the part
of typically small companies or research groups in academic settings.
They need to consider contributing resources. Viral licences need to be
allowed to enable conditional use; if funding is made available, such
licences can be converted to other types of licence.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
