Thanks Ian! It’s good to see there are so many “yes”-es! However, we’ll need some more info, for instance links to where the “relevant documentation of the development and approval process of the specification is archived and identified”.
We’ll handle the spreadsheet bit. ☺ Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Ian McNicoll Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:37 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR My first go now at CAMSS wiki page<https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>, There appears to be a major snafu with the CAMMS spreadsheet that auto-sets 'not applicable' to most of the rows if 'open specification' is set as the standard type. This makes some sense for a proprietary specification but none whatsoever for an open specification. @Silje - you may want to seek clarification from the CAMMS authors. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com<mailto:i...@freshehr.com> twitter: @ianmcnicoll [https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0BzLo3mNUvbAjT2R5Sm1DdFZYTU0&export=download] Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org<mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 5 January 2016 at 08:52, Bakke, Silje Ljosland <silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no<mailto:silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no>> wrote: I’ve added the CAMSS assessment table to the page. Would appreciate any help in populating the pink cells. ☺ Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org>] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:08 PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR I have set up a CAMSS wiki page<https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>, Silje if you can copy the relevant CAMSS boilerplate in (assessment table etc) and make it look vaguely presentable (make child pages if you need) then I am sure the community can get it populated quickly for you, since it's clearly of general benefit. - thomas On 04/01/2016 14:24, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: Hi Thomas, thanks for your reply! I don’t have any say in which assessment criteria are used, unfortunately. I’ve seen your criteria, and agree they’re more specifically applicable to e-health standards. I’ll probably need a lot of help answering and justifying the CAMSS questions, especially those regarding the governance of the specifications. I hope it’s okay if I pose specific questions to this list. Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 2:57 PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR Hi Silje, I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using CAMSS much, if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS assessments<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/camss-assessments>, none of which are health related. On this page <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/list-standards> there is a much larger list of 'recommended' standards which are all generic (PDF, GIF and so on) - I don't know what use this is. This page <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/wiki/camss-05-detailed-camss-criteria> has a long page of assessment criteria, which seem mostly reasonable to me, but are will probably miss what I would consider the most important criterion for value - longevity. I personally think longevity is ultimately based on semantic scalability (lack of other things will also kill it, like lack of community, implementations etc). See here <http://wolandscat.net/health-informatics/desiderata-for-successful-e-health-standards/> for my set of criteria. I also don't think that compatibility with other standards is necessarily a useful criterion - it depends on whether those other standards are in use and are themselves delivering value or just getting in the way. But overall the assessment tool seems OK. What I can't see is any example of where it has been applied to an e-health standard. - thomas _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
