1- What stands AP)SA(A'P’) for? Here below some missing topics we need to have agreement about
2- Thinking about the health and care provission documentation process there are: - Observation process - Evaluation process (including, and restricted to, diagnosis, diff diagnosis, problem kist, episode list, etc - Planning process - Ordering process - Execution process of acts 3- We need to recognise that some data is de novo, other data is repeated after a querry 4- Systems need to be aware that some data is directly health care care related, other is administrativem process oriented 5- When that what is documented is used in shared working processes we need a common vocabulary: i.e. System of Concepts for Continuity of Care Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 2 Apr 2018, at 14:06, Philippe Ameline <philippe.amel...@free.fr> wrote: > > Le 02/04/2018 à 12:54, A Verhees a écrit : > >> > The "good all" SOAP is dead ; nowadays, the encounter stream is switching >> > to (AP)SO(A'P'): >> > people now come with an existing set of Assessments and Procedures, >> > not "just" with "Subjective" issues. >> >> Wasn't that always the case? > > We are currently switching from "mainly acute" to "mainly chronic" care. > Reason why I claim that the "encounter information stream" must switch from > SOAP to (AP)SA(A'P') > > In my understanding, the concept of episodes of care came long after Weed > coined the SOAP approach; but I may be wrong. > > However, the main concept here is to consider an encounter as part of a > global process and no longer as an isolated event. This is, unfortunately, > still a disruptive concept ;-) > > Philippe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
