On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:39 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering whether we should move to org.apache.openejb?
Should we
do something else than just repackaging java files? Anything
legal or
similar?
Right we have to do both those things (repackage and switch
license headers).
We're going to have to be extra sensitive on the repackage as that
is really going knock Geronimo for a loop. Some sort of
coordination is in order.
agreed.... but I think the only impact should be in configs and
maybe assemblies. Dunno if the console refers to openejb at all.
I suspect the package change can be done with IDEA and it will find
the entries in configs and assemblies if you are using a project
with both openejb + g in it. I have a couple of those so if you
want I could do the refactoring.
Sold! Going once, going twice, gone.... <bangs gavel>
You do 2 and I'll do 3. How does that sound?
Should we do this soon and publish new jars on people.a.o or wait bit?
-David
Otherwise, what I do is check out openejb into thirdparty/
openejb2 inside geronimo and add this profile to the root g. pom:
<profile>
<id>all</id>
<modules>
<module>testsupport</module>
<module>modules</module>
<module>thirdparty/openejb2</module>
<module>maven-plugins</module>
<module>applications</module>
<module>configs</module>
<module>assemblies</module>
</modules>
</profile>
then mvn -o idea:idea -Pall generates the idea project containing
both g + openejb.
thanks
david jencks
-David
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
