On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we do this soon and publish new jars on people.a.o or
wait bit?
Do this now. There won't be any better time than today/tonight!
Jacek
Should this push up the version? That way, if someone is
referencing version 2.1.1 they know that the packaging is
org.openejb and if they use version 2.1.2 they know they are
using org.apache.openejb.
That would open a window for Geronimo to be changed over rather
than requiring the two to be tightly synchronized in the change
over.
I at least am only thinking of changing openejb2 trunk which is
currently building 2.2-SNAPSHOT. We can't change any of the tags
for previosly released versions. We could try fixing up branches/
2.1 but I think this requires more discussion and I'm not sure we
should plan on such a release.
Changing the version numbers might still be a good thing to do.
For the yoko support I've been working on, I changed my working
build to generate 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT artifacts. This small change
seriously saved my sanity when it came to dealing with the
corresponding Geronimo changes.
We have to add the word 'incubating' to the version of any snapshots
or release jars we publish (i.e. 2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT). That and
our groupId will now be org.apache.openejb.
So if there is a desire to bump the version for whatever reason,
that'd likely do the trick.
-David
Rick
thanks
david jencks
Jay
