On Sep 29, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Since I need to redo the packaging for the Yoko ORB support I've
been working on, this is a good time to ask the question. In the
process of creating the Yoko support, I copied what was done with
the sunorb and created a subpackage of org.openejb.corba to contain
the yoko adapters. This gave the tree packages of
org.openejb.corba.yoko and org.openejb.corba.sunorb.
Then, when I split these two out into separate modules so they were
built as separate units, I maintained those package names. Is it
legitimate to still use the org.openejb.corba parent package (which
is "owned" by the openejb-core module), or should I create a new
package structure for this? I was originally thinking
org.apache.openejb.orb.yoko and org.apache.openejb.orb.sunorb, but
having two different modules share the same packaging is making me
a little uneasy. Perhaps org.apache.openejb.yoko.orb and
org.apache.openejb.sun.orb would be better choices. Anybody have
any preferences, or should I just keep what I was using originally?
Why would we want to keep the sun orb stuff around if we have the
lovely Yoko code that does the same thing?
Regards,
Alan
