Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Since I need to redo the packaging for the Yoko ORB support I've been
working on, this is a good time to ask the question. In the process
of creating the Yoko support, I copied what was done with the sunorb
and created a subpackage of org.openejb.corba to contain the yoko
adapters. This gave the tree packages of org.openejb.corba.yoko and
org.openejb.corba.sunorb.
Then, when I split these two out into separate modules so they were
built as separate units, I maintained those package names. Is it
legitimate to still use the org.openejb.corba parent package (which
is "owned" by the openejb-core module), or should I create a new
package structure for this? I was originally thinking
org.apache.openejb.orb.yoko and org.apache.openejb.orb.sunorb, but
having two different modules share the same packaging is making me a
little uneasy. Perhaps org.apache.openejb.yoko.orb and
org.apache.openejb.sun.orb would be better choices. Anybody have any
preferences, or should I just keep what I was using originally?
Why would we want to keep the sun orb stuff around if we have the
lovely Yoko code that does the same thing?
Because until we've successfully completed the tck, we don't know it
does the same thing. Once we've verified that the yoko code is a full
function replacement to the sunorb, then we can decide to chuck it out.
But until we can verify it, or at least know what needs to be fixed to
make things pass, we still need to keep the other code around as an option.
Rick
Regards,
Alan
