:), Now I am confused, does it work or no it does not :)
On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah. That's correct. Maybe I should have tried a 'mvn clean install" there too (instead of doing just a "mvn test" Cheers Prasad On 3/15/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Prasad... > > You mean that the depedncy injection way failed ??? > > On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > BTW, this was not dependency injection. I went back to the old way of > > doing a lookup. > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey.. it works ! It works ! It works ! > > > > > > I cleaned out the openejb-core code and did a full build again. This > > > time it worked. > > > > > > All along, I was just doing a 'mvn test' in the core pkg. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Prasad > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi David and Prasad... > > > > > > > > Thanks David for your feedback, and I will take your comments into > > > > consideration. Prasad give me some time and I will look at your code > > > > changes. Did you attach your current code to the JIRA ?? If not please > > > > attach all your changes to it so I can apply it locally and look more > > at > > > > when I come back to home. > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 3/14/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 14, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK.. I tried both BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessLocal and > > > > > > > BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote. Same > > NameNotFoundException. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3942 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The bean and it's business interfaces are purely annotated and > > has no > > > > > > > entries in either the plan or the DD. But since the ejb.jarhas > > them > > > > > > > both, I guess as per the rules here > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/jndi-names.html, the jndi > > name is > > > > > > > deploymentId + "BusinessRemote" (or deploymentId + > > "BusinessLocal"). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyways that didn't work. > > > > > > > > > > > > That should definitely work. Can you try just looking up the name > > > > > > rather than using the experimental annotation stuff. Just extend > > > > > > StatefulTestClient, use the already created initialContext from > > the > > > > > > super class and lookup("BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote"). > > > > > > > > > > Same NameNotFoundException. Tried to lookup > > > > > "BasicStatelessInterceptor", "BasicStatelessInterceptorRemote", and > > > > > "BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote". > > > > > > > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3943 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming you have a business remote interface, not sure how you're > > > > > > declaring that. Could be you don't have any interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > Have use @Remote to declare a remote interface. Bean simply > > implements > > > > > this. > > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3944 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I am unsure is why Mohammad had to implement a > > > > > > > processFieldInjection() in TestClient. Chap 8 of the simplified > > spec > > > > > > > says client can expect to find resources by using annotations. > > > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't apply to test cases or any non-javaee > > components. Were > > > > > > our test suite an official app client (which we do have such a > > mode) > > > > > > it would still only apply to the app client main-class itself and > > > > > > then limited only to static methods and fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > Annotated injection for "plain java" code that want's to lookup an > > > > > > ejb is way outside the spec. > > > > > > > > > > Thanx for the explanation David. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/14/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks Mohammad. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I did apply your patch and had my test extend from > > > > > > >> > *AnnotatedFieldInjectionStatelessLocalTestClient*. See > > > > > > >> > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3923 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I get a NameNotFoundException: Name > > > > > > >> > "BasicStatelessInterceptorLocal" not found. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The name would be BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessLocal if > > you're > > > > > > >> using a business local interface. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On a different note, definitely use a remote or business remote > > > > > > >> interface where possible. Tests that use only local interfaces > > > > > > >> pretty much only run in OpenEJB embedded. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -David > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > But that bean seems to have been created and deployed. > > > > > > >> > INFO - Created Ejb(deployment-id=BasicStatelessInterceptor, > > > > > > >> > ejb-name=BasicStatelessInterceptor, container=Default > > Stateless > > > > > > >> > Container) > > > > > > >> > 10:56:07,592 INFO [startup] Created > > > > > > >> > Ejb(deployment-id=BasicStatelessInterceptor, > > > > > > >> > ejb-name=BasicStatelessInterceptor, container=Default > > Stateless > > > > > > >> > Container) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Cheers > > > > > > >> > Prasad > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > On 3/13/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> Hi Prasad... > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I came home late so I took a speed look on your code. First, > > if > > > > > > >> >> this is a > > > > > > >> >> local test client you should extend from > > > > > > >> >> BasicStatelessLocalTestClient. > > > > > > >> >> Second, in your case you are using a field annotated local > > test > > > > > > >> >> client so > > > > > > >> >> you have to extend from > > > > > > >> >> *AnnotatedFieldInjectionStatelessLocalTestClient* > > > > > > >> >> class. To have a better idea look at > > > > > > >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-519, and take a > > look > > > > > > >> >> at this > > > > > > >> >> mail on how to use and create annotated test clients > > > > > > >> >> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openejb-dev/ > > > > > > >> >> 200703.mbox/% > > > > > > >> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >> >> . > > > > > > >> >> But this code is not applied on the src code repository yet, > > it > > > > > > >> >> was supposed > > > > > > >> >> to be reviewed and then applied if it is OK. But I think I > > can > > > > > > >> >> apply it > > > > > > >> >> myself, as - as I think - I've been given the Karma to do > > so. But > > > > > > >> >> I will > > > > > > >> >> this tomorrow as I so tired and its too late here. You can > > take > > > > > > >> >> the patch > > > > > > >> >> and apply it locally, following the guidelines in the mail > > link > > > > > > >> >> provided > > > > > > >> >> above. If you still face problems please let me know, this > > is the > > > > > > >> >> second annotated test written and I need to know to how far > > > > > > >> >> annotated tests > > > > > > >> >> code is well implemented. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> On 3/13/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > Mine seems to be the only testcase which has a dependency > > > > > > >> >> injection on > > > > > > >> >> > the client side of itests. > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3902 > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > However, when executing this test > > (container/openejb-core), it > > > > > > >> >> fails > > > > > > >> >> > while doing an assertNotNull of the injected bean (line 38 > > in > > > > > > >> >> the code > > > > > > >> >> > above). > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Bug ? User-error ? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Please advise. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Cheers > > > > > > >> >> > Prasad > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > > >> >> Thanks > > > > > > >> >> - Mohammad Nour > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks > > > > - Mohammad Nour > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
