Hmm.. one way is to configure surefire plugin to skip tests in test phase. Then have a antrun execution bound to the test phase to spit out that message.
Configure surefire plugin to run in some other phase that gets executed during install lifecycle. Cheers Prasad On 3/15/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > Yeah. That's correct. > > Maybe I should have tried a 'mvn clean install" there too (instead of > doing just a "mvn test" I wonder if there was a way to disable 'mvn test' and have it spit out "Run 'mvn install' instead" Jeremy ran into that issue too. I'm not sure what's wrong with running mvn test, but it just doesn't seem to work. -David > Cheers > Prasad > > On 3/15/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Prasad... >> >> You mean that the depedncy injection way failed ??? >> >> On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > BTW, this was not dependency injection. I went back to the old >> way of >> > doing a lookup. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Prasad >> > >> > On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Hey.. it works ! It works ! It works ! >> > > >> > > I cleaned out the openejb-core code and did a full build >> again. This >> > > time it worked. >> > > >> > > All along, I was just doing a 'mvn test' in the core pkg. >> > > >> > > Cheers >> > > Prasad >> > > >> > > On 3/15/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Hi David and Prasad... >> > > > >> > > > Thanks David for your feedback, and I will take your >> comments into >> > > > consideration. Prasad give me some time and I will look at >> your code >> > > > changes. Did you attach your current code to the JIRA ?? If >> not please >> > > > attach all your changes to it so I can apply it locally and >> look more >> > at >> > > > when I come back to home. >> > > > >> > > > On 3/15/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > On 3/14/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mar 14, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > OK.. I tried both >> BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessLocal and >> > > > > > > BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote. Same >> > NameNotFoundException. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3942 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The bean and it's business interfaces are purely >> annotated and >> > has no >> > > > > > > entries in either the plan or the DD. But since the >> ejb.jar has >> > them >> > > > > > > both, I guess as per the rules here >> > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/jndi-names.html, >> the jndi >> > name is >> > > > > > > deploymentId + "BusinessRemote" (or deploymentId + >> > "BusinessLocal"). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Anyways that didn't work. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > That should definitely work. Can you try just looking >> up the name >> > > > > > rather than using the experimental annotation stuff. >> Just extend >> > > > > > StatefulTestClient, use the already created >> initialContext from >> > the >> > > > > > super class and lookup >> ("BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote"). >> > > > > >> > > > > Same NameNotFoundException. Tried to lookup >> > > > > "BasicStatelessInterceptor", >> "BasicStatelessInterceptorRemote", and >> > > > > "BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessRemote". >> > > > > >> > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3943 >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Assuming you have a business remote interface, not sure >> how you're >> > > > > > declaring that. Could be you don't have any interfaces. >> > > > > >> > > > > Have use @Remote to declare a remote interface. Bean simply >> > implements >> > > > > this. >> > > > > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3944 >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > What I am unsure is why Mohammad had to implement a >> > > > > > > processFieldInjection() in TestClient. Chap 8 of the >> simplified >> > spec >> > > > > > > says client can expect to find resources by using >> annotations. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > That doesn't apply to test cases or any non-javaee >> > components. Were >> > > > > > our test suite an official app client (which we do have >> such a >> > mode) >> > > > > > it would still only apply to the app client main-class >> itself and >> > > > > > then limited only to static methods and fields. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Annotated injection for "plain java" code that want's to >> lookup an >> > > > > > ejb is way outside the spec. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanx for the explanation David. >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -David >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers >> > > > > Prasad >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > > Prasad >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 3/14/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > Thanks Mohammad. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > I did apply your patch and had my test extend from >> > > > > > >> > *AnnotatedFieldInjectionStatelessLocalTestClient*. >> See >> > > > > > >> > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3923 >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > I get a NameNotFoundException: Name >> > > > > > >> > "BasicStatelessInterceptorLocal" not found. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> The name would be >> BasicStatelessInterceptorBusinessLocal if >> > you're >> > > > > > >> using a business local interface. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On a different note, definitely use a remote or >> business remote >> > > > > > >> interface where possible. Tests that use only local >> interfaces >> > > > > > >> pretty much only run in OpenEJB embedded. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> -David >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > But that bean seems to have been created and deployed. >> > > > > > >> > INFO - Created Ejb(deployment- >> id=BasicStatelessInterceptor, >> > > > > > >> > ejb-name=BasicStatelessInterceptor, container=Default >> > Stateless >> > > > > > >> > Container) >> > > > > > >> > 10:56:07,592 INFO [startup] Created >> > > > > > >> > Ejb(deployment-id=BasicStatelessInterceptor, >> > > > > > >> > ejb-name=BasicStatelessInterceptor, container=Default >> > Stateless >> > > > > > >> > Container) >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Cheers >> > > > > > >> > Prasad >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > On 3/13/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> Hi Prasad... >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> I came home late so I took a speed look on your >> code. First, >> > if >> > > > > > >> >> this is a >> > > > > > >> >> local test client you should extend from >> > > > > > >> >> BasicStatelessLocalTestClient. >> > > > > > >> >> Second, in your case you are using a field >> annotated local >> > test >> > > > > > >> >> client so >> > > > > > >> >> you have to extend from >> > > > > > >> >> *AnnotatedFieldInjectionStatelessLocalTestClient* >> > > > > > >> >> class. To have a better idea look at >> > > > > > >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-519, >> and take a >> > look >> > > > > > >> >> at this >> > > > > > >> >> mail on how to use and create annotated test clients >> > > > > > >> >> >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openejb-dev/ >> > > > > > >> >> 200703.mbox/% >> > > > > > >> >> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > >> >> . >> > > > > > >> >> But this code is not applied on the src code >> repository yet, >> > it >> > > > > > >> >> was supposed >> > > > > > >> >> to be reviewed and then applied if it is OK. But I >> think I >> > can >> > > > > > >> >> apply it >> > > > > > >> >> myself, as - as I think - I've been given the >> Karma to do >> > so. But >> > > > > > >> >> I will >> > > > > > >> >> this tomorrow as I so tired and its too late here. >> You can >> > take >> > > > > > >> >> the patch >> > > > > > >> >> and apply it locally, following the guidelines in >> the mail >> > link >> > > > > > >> >> provided >> > > > > > >> >> above. If you still face problems please let me >> know, this >> > is the >> > > > > > >> >> second annotated test written and I need to know >> to how far >> > > > > > >> >> annotated tests >> > > > > > >> >> code is well implemented. >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> On 3/13/07, Prasad Kashyap >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> > Mine seems to be the only testcase which has a >> dependency >> > > > > > >> >> injection on >> > > > > > >> >> > the client side of itests. >> > http://rifers.org/paste/show/3902 >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > However, when executing this test >> > (container/openejb-core), it >> > > > > > >> >> fails >> > > > > > >> >> > while doing an assertNotNull of the injected >> bean (line 38 >> > in >> > > > > > >> >> the code >> > > > > > >> >> > above). >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > Bug ? User-error ? >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > Please advise. >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > Cheers >> > > > > > >> >> > Prasad >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> Thanks >> > > > > > >> >> - Mohammad Nour >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Thanks >> > > > - Mohammad Nour >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> >
