Hi All... First welcome back Manu :). David, I think we should get a list of what should be completed to get a release, prioritize items of this list, put a draft due date upon which we should get this list done, I think this way we will have an initial plan showing us the way to the first OEJB3.0 release. And of course the due date can be determined by the details of the tasks and who will be assigned to each task, so the list can be decomposed into smaller parts each assignee is responsible for each part with a pre-determined due date to finish his\her tasks upon.
On 3/17/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Manu George wrote: > Hi David, > I am posting after some time in the list. Was not able to > contribute much in the prev 2 months to OEJB. Looks like a lot of > progress has been made. Kudos to the people who made it happen. A > release looks like a good idea. What are the items remaining now to be > completed for implementing the EJB3 spec?. Would like to start working > on OEJB again. I'll see if I can't whip something up. -David > Thanks > Manu > > > On 3/17/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've been wondering when we should start kicking some releases from >> the 3x branch out the door. I can't seem to come up with a good >> answer even in my own mind about when this should be. >> >> Seems we're doing really great as far as functionality and >> implementing EJB3 is concerned. We still have a ways to go, but not >> too far actually. >> >> >> Should we start shipping releases? If so what do we call them and >> when do we start? If not what do we need to get done? >> >> >> Thoughts? (floor's open to all, committer or not) >> >> >> -David >> >> >> >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
