Hi Manu, Here is the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-547 Cheers Prasad On 3/19/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Is anyone applying this? If not I will do it. This will be the first patch I commit to OPENEJB Regards Manu On 3/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No.. The patch is attached to the email. I wonder why it gets stripped > out here. David Blevins made a similar observation the other day. > > Hmm.. I am able to send patches to the geronimo dev list. > > Here it is in plain text ----- > > > Index: pom.xml > =================================================================== > --- pom.xml (revision 519970) > +++ pom.xml (working copy) > @@ -157,23 +157,7 @@ > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-clover-plugin</artifactId> > - <configuration> > - <jdk>1.5</jdk> > - <excludes> > - <exclude>**/package-info.java</exclude> > - </excludes> > - </configuration> > - <executions> > - <execution> > - <id>site</id> > - <phase>pre-site</phase> > - <goals> > - <goal>instrument</goal> > - <goal>aggregate</goal> > - <goal>save-history</goal> > - </goals> > - </execution> > - </executions> > + <version>2.3</version> > </plugin> > </plugins> > </build> > @@ -952,21 +936,73 @@ > </site> > </distributionManagement> > <reporting> > - <plugins> > - <plugin> > - <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > - <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> > - <version>2.1</version> > - <configuration> > - <aggregate>true</aggregate> > - </configuration> > - </plugin> > - <plugin> > - <artifactId>maven-clover-plugin</artifactId> > - <configuration> > - <generateHistorical>true</generateHistorical> > - </configuration> > - </plugin> > - </plugins> > - </reporting> > + <plugins> > + <plugin> > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > + <artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId> > + <version>2.0</version> > + </plugin> > + > + <plugin> > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > + <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> > + <version>2.1</version> > + <configuration> > + <minmemory>128m</minmemory> > + <maxmemory>512</maxmemory> > + <breakiterator>true</breakiterator> > + <quiet>true</quiet> > + <verbose>false</verbose> > + <source>1.5</source> > + <!-- > + FIXME: This worked in m1, but m2 complains about > it being an invalid flag > + > + > <additionalparam>-J-Djava.awt.headless=true</additionalparam> > + --> > + <linksource>true</linksource> > + <links> > + <!-- J2SE --> > + <link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/</link> > + <link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/</link> > + <link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/</link> > + > + <!-- JavaEE --> > + <link>http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/</link> > + <link>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/</link> > + > <link>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/</link> > + > + <!-- Libraries --> > + > <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections/apidocs</link> > + > <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/</link> > + <link>http://www.junit.org/junit/javadoc/</link> > + <link>http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/</link> > + <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/regexp/apidocs/</link> > + <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/api/</link> > + </links> > + </configuration> > + </plugin> > + > + <plugin> > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > + <artifactId>maven-jxr-plugin</artifactId> > + <version>2.0</version> > + </plugin> > + > + <plugin> > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > + <artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId> > + <version>2.1</version> > + <configuration> > + <targetJdk>1.5</targetJdk> > + </configuration> > + </plugin> > + > + <plugin> > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > + <artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId> > + <version>2.0.1</version> > + </plugin> > + > + </plugins> > + </reporting> > </project> > > > ------------ end of patch > > > Cheers > Prasad > > > > On 3/19/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Prasad... > > > > Which patch to apply :) ??? Did you forget to attach the patch ??? > > > > On 3/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Apply this patch and you can get 'mvn site' to work. > > > > > > You can also see surefire plsu many other reports., > > > > > > Cheers > > > Prasad > > > > > > On 3/18/07, lingling teng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Then how do we generate the documentation and the test report? I haven't > > > > seen any instruction on the Apache website of this project. Thanks! > > > > > > > > PS: I am a new comer and pls excuse my ingnorance. > > > > > > > > //Steven > > > > > > > > 2007/3/17, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:00 AM, lingling teng wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, all > > > > > > > > > > > > I have just checked out the latest revision of the openEJB and > > > > > > tried to > > > > > > build it using the command: mvn intall -Dassemble and the result > > > > > > was build > > > > > > successful. > > > > > > But when I tried to generate the report using the command: mvn > > > > > > site, I got > > > > > > the a fatal error which may be a license problem. The log is > > > > > > attached below. > > > > > > BTW, my OS is windows XP. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any hints? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We don't use maven to generate our site, so I've never tried that > > > goal. > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > //Stevens Teng > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > >
