I believe this is a relic from the past. For one, it is failing. Next,
nobody seems to be using it or have run it at all. Lastly, OpenEJB
does not even have it's maven generated site deployed.
Check http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/maven
Since it is preventing us from generating other reports, I removed it.
I think it would be better if you'd just comment it out and leave it
as is than totally removing it. If someone needs it bad enough, maybe
they can fix it and include it later.
But atleast we can start generating and deploying the site.
Cheers
Prasad
On 3/20/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Prasad,
The clover plugin part is having some deletions prasad.
Can you explain why?
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-clover-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<jdk>1.5</jdk>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/package-info.java</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>site</id>
<phase>pre-site</phase>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
<goal>aggregate</goal>
<goal>save-history</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Everything after artefactid has been removed in your patch. Is this
not required for generating clover reports any more?
Regards
Manu
On 3/20/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> Here is the JIRA
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-547
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 3/19/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is anyone applying this? If not I will do it. This will be the first
> > patch I commit to OPENEJB
> >
> > Regards
> > Manu
> >
> > On 3/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > No.. The patch is attached to the email. I wonder why it gets stripped
> > > out here. David Blevins made a similar observation the other day.
> > >
> > > Hmm.. I am able to send patches to the geronimo dev list.
> > >
> > > Here it is in plain text -----
> > >
> > >
> > > Index: pom.xml
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- pom.xml (revision 519970)
> > > +++ pom.xml (working copy)
> > > @@ -157,23 +157,7 @@
> > > <plugin>
> > > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>maven-clover-plugin</artifactId>
> > > - <configuration>
> > > - <jdk>1.5</jdk>
> > > - <excludes>
> > > - <exclude>**/package-info.java</exclude>
> > > - </excludes>
> > > - </configuration>
> > > - <executions>
> > > - <execution>
> > > - <id>site</id>
> > > - <phase>pre-site</phase>
> > > - <goals>
> > > - <goal>instrument</goal>
> > > - <goal>aggregate</goal>
> > > - <goal>save-history</goal>
> > > - </goals>
> > > - </execution>
> > > - </executions>
> > > + <version>2.3</version>
> > > </plugin>
> > > </plugins>
> > > </build>
> > > @@ -952,21 +936,73 @@
> > > </site>
> > > </distributionManagement>
> > > <reporting>
> > > - <plugins>
> > > - <plugin>
> > > - <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > - <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
> > > - <version>2.1</version>
> > > - <configuration>
> > > - <aggregate>true</aggregate>
> > > - </configuration>
> > > - </plugin>
> > > - <plugin>
> > > - <artifactId>maven-clover-plugin</artifactId>
> > > - <configuration>
> > > - <generateHistorical>true</generateHistorical>
> > > - </configuration>
> > > - </plugin>
> > > - </plugins>
> > > - </reporting>
> > > + <plugins>
> > > + <plugin>
> > > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > + <artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId>
> > > + <version>2.0</version>
> > > + </plugin>
> > > +
> > > + <plugin>
> > > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > + <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
> > > + <version>2.1</version>
> > > + <configuration>
> > > + <minmemory>128m</minmemory>
> > > + <maxmemory>512</maxmemory>
> > > + <breakiterator>true</breakiterator>
> > > + <quiet>true</quiet>
> > > + <verbose>false</verbose>
> > > + <source>1.5</source>
> > > + <!--
> > > + FIXME: This worked in m1, but m2 complains about
> > > it being an invalid flag
> > > +
> > > +
> > > <additionalparam>-J-Djava.awt.headless=true</additionalparam>
> > > + -->
> > > + <linksource>true</linksource>
> > > + <links>
> > > + <!-- J2SE -->
> > > +
<link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
> > > + <!-- JavaEE -->
> > > +
<link>http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
> > > <link>http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/</link>
> > > +
> > > + <!-- Libraries -->
> > > +
> > > <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections/apidocs</link>
> > > +
> > > <link>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/apidocs/</link>
> > > + <link>http://www.junit.org/junit/javadoc/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://jakarta.apache.org/regexp/apidocs/</link>
> > > +
<link>http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/api/</link>
> > > + </links>
> > > + </configuration>
> > > + </plugin>
> > > +
> > > + <plugin>
> > > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > + <artifactId>maven-jxr-plugin</artifactId>
> > > + <version>2.0</version>
> > > + </plugin>
> > > +
> > > + <plugin>
> > > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > + <artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
> > > + <version>2.1</version>
> > > + <configuration>
> > > + <targetJdk>1.5</targetJdk>
> > > + </configuration>
> > > + </plugin>
> > > +
> > > + <plugin>
> > > + <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > > +
<artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId>
> > > + <version>2.0.1</version>
> > > + </plugin>
> > > +
> > > + </plugins>
> > > + </reporting>
> > > </project>
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------ end of patch
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Prasad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/19/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Prasad...
> > > >
> > > > Which patch to apply :) ??? Did you forget to attach the patch ???
> > > >
> > > > On 3/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Apply this patch and you can get 'mvn site' to work.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can also see surefire plsu many other reports.,
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Prasad
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/18/07, lingling teng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Then how do we generate the documentation and the test report? I
haven't
> > > > > > seen any instruction on the Apache website of this project. Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS: I am a new comer and pls excuse my ingnorance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > //Steven
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2007/3/17, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:00 AM, lingling teng wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi, all
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have just checked out the latest revision of the openEJB and
> > > > > > > > tried to
> > > > > > > > build it using the command: mvn intall -Dassemble and the result
> > > > > > > > was build
> > > > > > > > successful.
> > > > > > > > But when I tried to generate the report using the command: mvn
> > > > > > > > site, I got
> > > > > > > > the a fatal error which may be a license problem. The log is
> > > > > > > > attached below.
> > > > > > > > BTW, my OS is windows XP.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any hints? Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We don't use maven to generate our site, so I've never tried that
> > > > > goal.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -David
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > //Stevens Teng
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks
> > > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
