On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 at 11:58, Richard Purdie via
lists.openembedded.org
<[email protected]> wrote:
> a) systemd is not well supported on some of our key supported targets
> (e.g. musl). I appreciate that is changing, we're not there yet though.
This is how upstream sees the newly added musl support:
This support for musl is provided without a promise of continued
support in future releases. We'll make the decision based on the
amount of work required to maintain the compatibility layer in
systemd, how many musl-specific bugs are reported, and feedback on
the desirability of this effort provided by users and distributions.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259/NEWS#L534
To me this looks both non-committal and vaguely passive-aggressive.
This may change, but the issue is not musl support per se, it's
upstream's mindset about alternatives.
Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2262):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2262
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117872790/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
