On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:05 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On 10/4/2011 3:03 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> > sysprof will not build properly without this defined >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock<m...@freescale.com> >> > --- >> > No comments on original patch sent >> > >> > meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb | 2 ++ >> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > index 10bde04..271b5d8 100644 >> > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_arm = " file://rmb-arm.patch" >> > SRC_URI_append_mips = " file://rmb-mips.patch" >> > SRC_URI_append_powerpc = " file://ppc-macro-fix.patch" >> > >> > +export CFLAGS_append_powerpc64 = " -D__ppc64__" >> > + >> >> this is a gcc built-in define I wonder why you need to add it explicitly > > Are you sure? Is the built-in define not __powerpc64__ ?
yes that one too is a builtin define. I don't have the OE/ppc64 build around to explore more > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
