On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:48 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> this is a gcc built-in define I wonder why you need to add it explicitly >> >> Are you sure? Is the built-in define not __powerpc64__ ? > > Further investigation: > > [mattsm@right build_p5020ds-64b_release (testing $)]$ > ./tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/ppc64e5500-fsl-linux/powerpc64-fsl-linux-gcc > -c -E -dM empty.c | grep __p > #define __powerpc64__ 1 > #define __powerpc__ 1 > [mattsm@right build_p5020ds-64b_release (testing $)]$
yes I was trying it with a differently configured gcc. For linux gcc defines __powerpc64__ and for darwin it has __ppc64__ as builtin define. I think adding check for __powerpc64__ and __powerpc__ would be nice and can be submitted to sysprof upstream IMO > > -M > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
