On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nathan, this is awesome! > > (haven't tested it yet, but it's great to see this effort!!) > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >> On 10 September 2017 at 14:14, Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com> wrote: >>> >>> Please note whilst this series is sent for oe-core it may be better >>> located in another layer? (e.g. meta-oe). However since the recipes and >>> the tools they build are not specific to a single BSP it did not make >>> sense to keep in a BSP specific layer. >> >> >> Sounds like a dedicated FPGA layer would be ideal. > > We already have meta-xilinx (and friends) and meta-altera, looks like > a meta-lattice is in order?
For open tools like these I think a meta-fpga layer makes sense. Hopefully then others can build off it. Thanks, Alistair > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core