On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:45 AM, Anuj Mittal <anuj.mit...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 04:49 AM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > +KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " ${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES',
> 'numa', 'features/numa/numa.scc', '', d)}"
>
> Isn't this enough to pull in the required configuration from
>
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-
> cache/tree/features/numa/numa.cfg
>
> If numa.cfg is missing something in yocto-kernel-cache that should be
> applied to all machines, perhaps these configurations should be added
> there?
>
Correct.
I wanted to run with this patch myself before sending feedback. In fact, I
think that the kernel-cache
numa config fragments are being used anyway. But since I'm traveling, I
haven't gotten to that yet.
Alistair: if you drop your fragment, are you actually getting a failure
during the kernel meta data task ?
I will resubmit my patches shortly that allow any kernel to leverage the
shared config frags, so
using the ones in the kernel cache definitely makes sense.
Bruce
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
--
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
