On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Bruce Ashfield
<bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:45 AM, Anuj Mittal <anuj.mit...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/03/2018 04:49 AM, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> > +KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " ${@bb.utils.contains('MACHINE_FEATURES',
>> > 'numa', 'features/numa/numa.scc', '', d)}"
>>
>> Isn't this enough to pull in the required configuration from
>>
>>
>> https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-cache/tree/features/numa/numa.cfg
>>
>> If numa.cfg is missing something in yocto-kernel-cache that should be
>> applied to all machines, perhaps these configurations should be added
>> there?
>
>
> Correct.
>
> I wanted to run with this patch myself before sending feedback. In fact, I
> think that the kernel-cache
> numa config fragments are being used anyway. But since I'm traveling, I
> haven't gotten to that yet.
>
> Alistair: if you drop your fragment, are you actually getting a failure
> during the kernel meta data task ?>From memory I didn't see a failure, but I didn't see the NUMA support in the kernel. I'll run a test now. Alistair > > I will resubmit my patches shortly that allow any kernel to leverage the > shared config frags, so > using the ones in the kernel cache definitely makes sense. > > Bruce > > >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at > its end" > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
