On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:07 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 12/13/2011 11:48 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov<dbarysh...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> .../pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb | 3 ++- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb > >> b/meta/recipes-multimedia/pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb > >> index 184c167..f81aeb6 100644 > >> --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb > >> @@ -26,5 +26,6 @@ ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" > >> inherit autotools pkgconfig > >> > >> do_install_append() { > >> - mv ${D}${datadir}/libatomic_ops ${D}${datadir}/libatomic-ops || true > >> + # those contain only docs, not necessary for now. > >> + rm -rf ${D}${datadir}/libatomic_ops || true > >> } > > > > Shouldn't we move that to docdir/${PN}? > > I'm thinking another way: why is the recipe called libatomicS-ops (note > the S) if the upstream source is named as libatomc_ops (so it should > become libatomic-ops). Then documentation will land in the proper place > after the mv command which is currently in place.
I agree it should probably get renamed, I can't see a good reason for that name. That will potentially cause some friction with other things depending on it though :( Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core