On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:10 PM Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 07:54:32PM +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > > > > > meta-openembedded/meta-python has a higher layer priority than OE-core. > > > > > > Adding higher upstream versions of these recipes to a lower-priority > > > layer in a stable series is a potential source for weird problems. > > > > I would assume they'd be removed from meta-python at the same time > > they are added to meta. > > "at the same time" is complicated since OE-core has releases, > but meta-openembedded is just a branch. > > I would also assume that not all users of stable series are updating > meta-openembedded to the latest on the dunfell branch at the same > time as OE-core, some users might end up updating one but never > updating the other one.
That I believe would be a terrible mistake when people opt-in to take a layer, but never care about updating it... :( On the contrary, a quick run of "bitbake-layers show-overlayed" exhibits the following on the [master] of both OE-Core and meta-openembedded: ================= python3-cython: meta-python 0.29.14 meta 0.29.16 python3-dbusmock: meta-python 0.16.7 meta 0.19 python3-docutils: meta-python 0.15.2 meta 0.16 python3-pyparsing: meta-python 2.4.6 meta 2.4.7 ================= Judging be versions, it looks like OE-Core recipes are maintained, but in meta-openembedded they are left on the side... > > > //Peter > > cu > Adrian > -- Regards, Andrey.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#138369): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138369 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74214757/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
