On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 01:54 +0800, zhengruoqin wrote: > Please reference to https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1018. > > Upstream-Status: Submitted > [https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/merge_requests/1285]. > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin <zhengrq.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > ...license-to-GPLv2.1-to-keep-with-LICENSE-f.patch | 88 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls_3.6.13.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls/0001-Modied- > the-license-to-GPLv2.1-to-keep-with-LICENSE-f.patch
No, you simply cannot just do that. If upstream takes the patch we can apply as a backport but until they accept a license change we can and will not. Just because the license file says something doesn't mean every file is under that license if that file's header says differently. I suspect upstream won't accept this patch either. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139337): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139337 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74748083/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
