On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:06 PM Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 23:51, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Good sleuthing. Can you find out if libseccomp is in play ? if so >> what version of libseccomp is being used by cmake if it is libseccomp >> < 2.4.2 then time64 syscall support won't be there unless >> its backported to the older version. > > > From what i could tell cmake does not use libseccomp, but centos8 could have > some kind of syscall filtering in place. It would be good to try with a few > older centos8 kernels. >
here is a small testcase to excercise utimensat_time64 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xantares/test-seccomp-time64/master/test-time64.c gcc -m32 test-time64.c it will be good to check how the resulting binary behaves with centos provided libc and sdk provided one. > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#152745): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/152745 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83304703/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
