Hi, Sorry, but personally I don't like your idea. What's the benefit of reverting this? I would keep the ${} for bitbake and $ for shell. The {} has to be placed only for variables like $a${b}c. We should respect the workflow on all recipes otherwise we're braking the "unwritten" rules.
Regards, Andrej On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 03:36 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 1/29/22 03:01, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > Hi, > > [...] > > > Personally I do not see it as inconsistent, it is just the way > > shell handles variables. It is just something to get used to (I > > also had a colleague who would review any shell code changes we > > made and comment on every single unnecessary character so one > > quickly learned to use $foo everywhere possible rather than > > ${foo}...) > > quickly start putting the {} everywhere. That's my case. > > (we should likely stop this ^ discussion thread before it turns into > a > flamewar) > > > That said, I have never looked at this code so I > > have no real idea of how bad it is or isn't. > > This patch lists pretty much all the vars, so you can get a pretty > decent idea from just looking at that. > > > > third alternative ? I mean, besides rewriting the fitimage > > > generation into python, which might make it more flexible too. > > > > Replacing shell code that has grown beyond a couple of hundred > > (tens?) lines with something written in a better language is > > almost always a good idea. > > It's grown to almost 800 LoC, so maybe it is time to reevaluate the > python conversion then.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#161117): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/161117 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88758521/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-