On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 11:36 AM Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> For example, imagine the dependency is "virtual/libc" and somehow you
> break the providers of it, i.e. break the glibc recipe. All of a sudden
> "bitbake world" would return success even though it built nothing since
> anything depending on virtual/libc was magically removed (which is
> nearly everything at some point).
>
> The conclusion I came too last time I thought about this was they we
> really did want to mark up the cases where things have a specific
> requirement, even if at times that is painful.
>

FWIW: here is the earlier (2014) discussion about this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1414675717.7649.56.camel@ted/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#175572): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/175572
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95842308/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to