On Thu, 2023-01-19 at 08:55 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:57 AM Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Anuj/Bruce/Jan-Simon/Scott, > > > > Please see the links below. This patch, pending for master triggers a > > few warnings in a few layers as there are a handful of patches with no > > Upstream-Status present in them. > > > > I know this kind of thing is annoying but it is probably worth starting > > to give the wider community the hint that they should document this, > > and if they do document it, it might remind them to try and submit them > > too. You're not the target audience but as layers being tested on the > > autobuilder you get to lead by example! :) > > > > If anyone doesn't want to tweak things to fix this, we can disable the > > warnings for that specific test but I would prefer not to, I think this > > is the right thing to encourage. The numbers of issues are low and > > easily avoided one way or another. > > I'd prefer the upstream-status check to be disabled for meta-virtualization. > > This isn't something that I'm strictly enforcing, and not something that I > want to start strictly enforcing.
I understand and will see what I can do to change the configurations, I was hoping to avoid that. Just as a heads up, there is an open action for the TSC to discuss which QA checks shouldn't be bypassed for compatible layer status. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#176141): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176141 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96354584/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
