On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 09:13 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
> 
> Em ter., 5 de mar. de 2024 às 21:06, Richard Purdie
> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu:
> > On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 14:36 -0600, Tom Hochstein wrote:
> > > The rename of bmap-tools to bmaptool creates an incompatibility
> > > for
> > > pre-scarthgap layers. Restore compatibility by adding bmap-tools
> > > as
> > > an alias.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochst...@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/recipes-support/bmaptool/bmaptool_git.bb | 8 ++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Perhaps we should just drop nanbield from the layer series instead
> > as
> > we're about to do that anyway?
> > 
> > I'm worried this will just mask things and stop people renaming :/.
> > 
> 
> 
> I understand your point of view, but it is a must for package feeds,
> or it will break them. 

You need the R* changes for that which is fair enough but you do not
the PROVIDES...

Cheers,

Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#196672): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/196672
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104753355/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to