On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 13:46 +0200, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> From: Alexander Kanavin <a...@linutronix.de>
>
> This is already performed in eSDK creation; the change allows also
> making a copy with a standalone 'bitbake -S unihash-cache-copy targets...'
> command, which is useful for replicating builds on a different build host
> (simply coping sstate objects is not enough if they need to be discovered
> through unihash redirections).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <a...@linutronix.de>
> ---
> meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py b/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> index a46e5502ab3..5dfd180e7f2 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ class SignatureGeneratorOEBasicHashMixIn(object):
> sigfile = os.getcwd() + "/locked-sigs.inc"
> bb.plain("Writing locked sigs to %s" % sigfile)
> self.dump_lockedsigs(sigfile)
> + if 'unihash-cache-copy' in options:
> + cachefile = os.getcwd() + "/bb_unihashes.dat"
> + bb.plain("Writing unihash cache to %s" % cachefile)
> + bb.parse.siggen.copy_unitaskhashes(os.getcwd())
> return super(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasicHash,
> self).dump_sigs(dataCache, options)
>
I think we can drop the piece above now after this:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=652e3028d9763aef318ff4587f2c21a8b280003f
The copy_unitaskhashes code is really problematic within bitbake and
was a horrible hack/workaround anyway so it needs to be removed.
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#200324):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200324
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105958243/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
