Dear all,
What meeting is being referenced ? What was the conclusion of such?
Kind Regards,
Antonios
On 8/28/25 1:08 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 17: 24, Yoann Congal <yoann. congal@ smile. fr>
wrote: > That is the whole point of the ticket: realign what the
existings run-ptest scripts do, what the dos says, what the code
running tests expects (ptest-runner
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source
of this email and know the content is safe.
Report Suspicious
<https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/G3vK!tDdkczhAu0BQayqqdF8IsugIjX7zadsugLmM-EbBW8Oq0a4_NJqc3VSXvZy3_udB9hIMqaoUjEqvKMEG22xp083xtuY8ML3NRgyFVVZtLOCIG2rqv1J7v14pKoM$>
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 17:24, Yoann Congal <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is the whole point of the ticket: realign what the existings run-ptest
scripts do, what the dos says, what the code running tests expects (ptest-runner &
testimage)
> Maybe we should talk about it in a tuesday call?
We can talk, but I do not think it is realistic to have new
requirements on run-ptest, especially around return codes. They are
expected to print at least one PASS or FAIL, and it stops there.
Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#222736):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/222736
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/114926113/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
