On 8 May 2012 02:56, Scott Garman <scott.a.gar...@intel.com> wrote: > > I can understand why we're trying to ensure our build system doesn't require > /bin/sh to be bash, but I think support scripts like runqemu might be a > special case. > > What do other people in the community think of this? The runqemu script > isn't trivial, and it has to run in a lot of different contexts. Should we > put the time in to make it shell-agnostic, or allow it to require bash?
1) Do not require /bin/sh to be bash 2) It's ok, and for "right tool for the job" -reasons often prefered, to require that development machine has also bash installed. So I'm happy with how runqemu currently has #!/bin/bash shebang. It requires bash to be present, but not necessarily as /bin/sh - ML _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
