On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:00 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > I've found Richard's comments [looking in OE archive and not poky > helped] and will test what he proposed to replace FILESDIR. But I still > think it extremely worthwhile if some fine tuning to the mailing list(s) > can be done to address what I mentioned below.
Can you be more specific about what you think should be changed? If I look at the message of yours that I'm replying to, it has: Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from linuxtogo.org ([188.40.83.200]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1SmR3u-0002an-JT for [email protected]; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:00:14 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1SmREX-0006Iq-NQ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1SmREW-0006Ih-OQ for [email protected]; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 [...] From: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> To: Saul Wold <[email protected]> Message-id: <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] which all seems in order. Which part do you think is wrong? > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it > > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings? [I'd have to > > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that > > messes things up.] > > > > Further, without a proper Message-ID, it breaks patchworks, so Richard's > > comments should be here: p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
