[Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates] On 04/07/2012 (Wed 16:29) Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:00 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > I've found Richard's comments [looking in OE archive and not poky > > helped] and will test what he proposed to replace FILESDIR. But I still > > think it extremely worthwhile if some fine tuning to the mailing list(s) > > can be done to address what I mentioned below. > > Can you be more specific about what you think should be changed? If I > look at the message of yours that I'm replying to, it has: > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > Received: from linuxtogo.org ([188.40.83.200]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with > esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from > <[email protected]>) id 1SmR3u-0002an-JT for > [email protected]; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:00:14 +0200 > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim > 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id > 1SmREX-0006Iq-NQ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 > Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with > esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id > 1SmREW-0006Ih-OQ for [email protected]; Wed, 04 Jul > 2012 17:11:13 +0200 > > [...] > > From: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]> > To: Saul Wold <[email protected]> > Message-id: <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > > which all seems in order. Which part do you think is wrong? > > > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it > > > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings? [I'd have to > > > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that > > > messes things up.] Hi Phil, Your mail suffers the exact same problem. My address is nowhere to be seen on the To/Cc: I only happened to see it since I told mutt to show me all archived poky/oe mails with u-boot in the subject. Otherwise your message would have been lost in the noise, perhaps seen next week when I return from OOO. And when I hit reply, it won't go to you unless I tell mutt to ignore the broken Reply-To line. It is the line right at the bottom: ----------- From: Phil Blundell <[email protected]> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:29:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1341415765.20265.30.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer <[email protected]> ----------- Note the absence of the To/Cc: with my name? How are people to sort the "needs attention from me now" mails from the general mailing list traffic? The hijack effect of "Reply-To:" is evil and should be removed. It isn't used on any of the other dozen devel mailing lists I'm on. Thanks, Paul. -- > > > > > > Further, without a proper Message-ID, it breaks patchworks, so Richard's > > > comments should be here: > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
