On Thursday 25 July 2013 15:02:04 Shakeel, Muhammad wrote:
> From: Muhammad Shakeel <muhammad_shak...@mentor.com>
> 
> 'pidof' is alternatively coming from busybox so no need for avahi to
> explicitly rdepend on sysvinit-pidof. This unnecessarily includes sysvinit
> in systemd only build.

Surely this just results in sysvinit being built as opposed to being included 
in the image?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to