On Thursday 25 July 2013 15:02:04 Shakeel, Muhammad wrote: > From: Muhammad Shakeel <muhammad_shak...@mentor.com> > > 'pidof' is alternatively coming from busybox so no need for avahi to > explicitly rdepend on sysvinit-pidof. This unnecessarily includes sysvinit > in systemd only build.
Surely this just results in sysvinit being built as opposed to being included in the image? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core