On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On 13-08-26 12:08 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >> Thanks! And honestly, I didn't leave out the upstream status on purpose >> this time .. like I said, it just isn't in my workflow, since I normally >> seek and destroy them! >> >> I'm pretty sure I can't convince the kernel guys to not export that >> structure, but I can try. Otherwise, it can have the "dirty hack" upstream >> status. >> >> > >> > I will put this in MUT so we can move forward tonight. >> >> Fingers crossed, my builds are working here. > > Things failed badly on the autobuilder since we dropped the command > length patch and it was still needed. I've updated it against 3.10, > confirmed it worked on the autobuilder and then merged things.
Argh. I was emailed about that same patch in the mainline kernel, and when I tested my previously "long" directory name .. it worked. Thanks for pulling it back in, I had my doubts, which is why I hand't removed it completely :) Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core