On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 08:39 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 00:26 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 13-08-26 12:08 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> Thanks! And honestly, I didn't leave out the upstream status on purpose > >> this time .. like I said, it just isn't in my workflow, since I normally > >> seek and destroy them! > >> > >> I'm pretty sure I can't convince the kernel guys to not export that > >> structure, but I can try. Otherwise, it can have the "dirty hack" upstream > >> status. > >> > >> > > >> > I will put this in MUT so we can move forward tonight. > >> > >> Fingers crossed, my builds are working here. > > > > Things failed badly on the autobuilder since we dropped the command > > length patch and it was still needed. I've updated it against 3.10, > > confirmed it worked on the autobuilder and then merged things. > > Argh. I was emailed about that same patch in the mainline kernel, and when > I tested my previously "long" directory name .. it worked.
I think there is a dependency on the running kernel version too... > Thanks for pulling it back in, I had my doubts, which is why I hand't removed > it completely :) I kind of guessed that was why the patch was still there :) Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core